Bug 454888
Summary: | Review Request: libgdither - Library for applying dithering to PCM audio sources | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) <kwizart> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Gwyn Ciesla <gwync> |
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | adel.gadllah, fedora-package-review, gwync, notting, zarko.pintar |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | gwync:
fedora-review+
kevin: fedora-cvs+ |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2009-03-24 20:41:53 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 456242, 496433 |
Description
Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart)
2008-07-10 15:50:53 UTC
rpmlint on srpm clean. rpmlint on rpms: libgdither-devel.i386: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. Anything to put here? License, naming, macros, scripts, all good. Full review is very clean. No BR issues evident after a mock build. Other than the one minor bit above, we're ready to rock and/or roll. I'll use my copies to start reviewing gavl. Hello, and sorry for the late answear I think the whole framework could have a issue. Specially on lib64 system (mutlilibs systems using /usr/lib64 as a standard path for libs). And maybe we have a problem with -FPIC not been used on x86 system. (light library can avoid using Position independant Code for shared libs, but it cannot be prelinked and can gives selinux denials) I'm still searching for package to test frei0r-plugins usability (for now i'm using my own package of LiVES but mlt could be a good candidate) I will use my public/experimental repository for testing the whole framework against rawhide x86 Hello, What happened with this packet? I want prepare frei0r-plugins for Fedora but I need this packet as dependency. I prepare this packet for Fedora 10 so please, if you want to see my spec and src: http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/728801/kdenlive/sources/libgdither.spec http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/728801/kdenlive/sources/libgdither-0.6-2.fc10.src.rpm Please see them. kind regards, Zarko This package is still waiting for a reviewer. @Zarko You aren't a sponsored packager at this time, so you need to follow this: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join But since ExcludeArch is undeeded, as the package will build at least on our primary arches; Il will stay with: Spec URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/libgdither.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/libgdither-0.6-1.fc8.kwizart.src.rpm Description: Library for applying dithering to PCM audio sources @Jon Any news from your side ? (In reply to comment #4) > This package is still waiting for a reviewer. > > @Zarko > You aren't a sponsored packager at this time, so you need to follow this: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join Yes, because this packets are my first job and waiting so long. At this moment I do not have any new packet for build so I do not know how I can be sponsored packager without completely new packets? BTW, Why these packets are waiting so long for review? (I mean on gavl and frei0r-plugins, too) (In reply to comment #4) > This package is still waiting for a reviewer. > > @Zarko > You aren't a sponsored packager at this time, so you need to follow this: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join Yes, because this packets are my first job and waiting so long. At this moment I do not have any new packet for build so I do not know how I can be sponsored packager without completely new packets? BTW, Why these packets are waiting so long for review? (I mean on gavl and frei0r-plugins, too) (In reply to comment #4) > This package is still waiting for a reviewer. > > @Zarko > You aren't a sponsored packager at this time, so you need to follow this: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join Yes, because this packets are my first job and waiting so long. At this moment I do not have any new packet for build so I do not know how I can be sponsored packager without completely new packets? BTW, Why these packets are waiting so long for review? (I mean on gavl and frei0r-plugins, too) (In reply to comment #4) > This package is still waiting for a reviewer. > > @Zarko > You aren't a sponsored packager at this time, so you need to follow this: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join Yes, because this packets are my first job and waiting so long. At this moment I do not have any new packet for build so I do not know how I can be sponsored packager without completely new packets? BTW, Why these packets are waiting so long for review? (I mean on gavl and frei0r-plugins, too) Nicolas, I'll finish this review shortly, and move from there. Looks good still, is there documentation that could go in -devel? And are the issues you raised in #2 resolved? I'm not worried about libgdither itself, I was able to link gavl with libgdither from my own repository (using mock). One can use the mock config files to start testing the packages built from my repository. What will need more looks is the way the targetted binary (I was testing LiVES) will behaves with the frei0r-plugins Ok, then APPROVED. I'll move on down the chain. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libgdither Short Description: Library for applying dithering to PCM audio sources Owners: kwizart Branches: F-10 F-9 EL-5 Cvsextras Commits: yes cvs done. |