Bug 456149
Summary: | route add fails with error "SIOCADDRT: No such process\n" | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | John Poelstra <poelstra> | ||||
Component: | net-tools | Assignee: | Radek Vokál <rvokal> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | low | ||||||
Version: | 9 | CC: | zprikryl | ||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2008-08-01 09:18:50 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
John Poelstra
2008-07-21 18:52:31 UTC
Created attachment 312291 [details]
strace
note the wired network also does not work correctly with NetworkManager in that a default route is not set automatically. What is unique about the wired network is that I CAN manually set the default route. Please, can you describe here whole configuration of your network? I neam IP, netmask, ... Thanks. After researching this further I have found that the problem appears to be with my dhcp server (linksys running openwrt). I was using static dhcp assignments and when I disable the MAC address association everything works fine. My current theory is that I have a some stale MAC address associations that I can't clear out of the router for some reason. Is this still a bug? IOW should 'route' return the error it does if it can't set a route? In my opinion, this is the configuration error, not a error in net-tools. Returned error message reflect the problem which was caused by setting wrong route, so I think that there is no problem with it. In any case I'm closing this as NOTABUG. |