Bug 456783

Summary:	Review Request: WebKit-sharp - WebKit bindings for Mono
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Mathieu BONIFACE <mathieu.boniface>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	rawhide	CC:	fedora-package-review, gnomeuser, manuel.wolfshant, notting
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2009-02-24 19:14:38 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Mathieu BONIFACE 2008-07-27 01:19:37 UTC

Spec URL: http://mat.boniface.googlepages.com/WebKit-sharp.spec
SRPM URL: http://mat.boniface.googlepages.com/WebKit-sharp-0.2-1.fc9.src.rpm
Description: This package provides Mono bindings for WebKit libraries

rpmlint says :
[builder@mathieu SPECS]$ rpmlint /home/builder/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/WebKit-sharp-*
WebKit-sharp.i386: E: no-binary
WebKit-sharp.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
WebKit-sharp-devel.i386: W: no-documentation
WebKit-sharp-doc.i386: W: no-documentation
WebKit-sharp-doc.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 2 warnings.
[builder@mathieu SPECS]$ rpmlint /home/builder/rpmbuild/SRPMS/WebKit-sharp-0.2-1.fc9.src.rpm 
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

Also, I think only-non-binary-in-usr-lib and no-binary errors can be ignored for mono packages.

Note that mock builds are good for fedora-9-i386 and fedora-rawhide-i386.

It's not my first review request, but I need a sponsor.
(see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454207)

Comment 1 David Nielsen 2009-02-24 14:15:22 UTC

Are you still interested in this package? I ask because I have submitted the same one but I see yours predates mine. I will be happy to review your work if you still want to maintain this component.

Comment 2 Mathieu BONIFACE 2009-02-24 16:22:51 UTC

I'm not particularly interested to maintain this package now, consequently you can take it.
In fact I've proposed it because it was a dependence for « galaxium messenger », but the project seems dead.