Bug 456783 - Review Request: WebKit-sharp - WebKit bindings for Mono
Review Request: WebKit-sharp - WebKit bindings for Mono
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review (Show other bugs)
rawhide
All Linux
low Severity medium
: ---
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
:
Depends On:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2008-07-26 21:19 EDT by Mathieu BONIFACE
Modified: 2009-02-24 14:14 EST (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-02-24 14:14:38 EST
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
CRM:
Verified Versions:
Category: ---
oVirt Team: ---
RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---


Attachments (Terms of Use)

  None (edit)
Description Mathieu BONIFACE 2008-07-26 21:19:37 EDT
Spec URL: http://mat.boniface.googlepages.com/WebKit-sharp.spec
SRPM URL: http://mat.boniface.googlepages.com/WebKit-sharp-0.2-1.fc9.src.rpm
Description: This package provides Mono bindings for WebKit libraries

rpmlint says :
[builder@mathieu SPECS]$ rpmlint /home/builder/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/WebKit-sharp-*
WebKit-sharp.i386: E: no-binary
WebKit-sharp.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
WebKit-sharp-devel.i386: W: no-documentation
WebKit-sharp-doc.i386: W: no-documentation
WebKit-sharp-doc.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 2 warnings.
[builder@mathieu SPECS]$ rpmlint /home/builder/rpmbuild/SRPMS/WebKit-sharp-0.2-1.fc9.src.rpm 
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

Also, I think only-non-binary-in-usr-lib and no-binary errors can be ignored for mono packages.

Note that mock builds are good for fedora-9-i386 and fedora-rawhide-i386.

It's not my first review request, but I need a sponsor.
(see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454207)
Comment 1 David Nielsen 2009-02-24 09:15:22 EST
Are you still interested in this package? I ask because I have submitted the same one but I see yours predates mine. I will be happy to review your work if you still want to maintain this component.
Comment 2 Mathieu BONIFACE 2009-02-24 11:22:51 EST
I'm not particularly interested to maintain this package now, consequently you can take it.
In fact I've proposed it because it was a dependence for « galaxium messenger », but the project seems dead.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.