Bug 456783 - Review Request: WebKit-sharp - WebKit bindings for Mono
Summary: Review Request: WebKit-sharp - WebKit bindings for Mono
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2008-07-27 01:19 UTC by Mathieu BONIFACE
Modified: 2009-02-24 19:14 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-02-24 19:14:38 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Mathieu BONIFACE 2008-07-27 01:19:37 UTC
Spec URL: http://mat.boniface.googlepages.com/WebKit-sharp.spec
SRPM URL: http://mat.boniface.googlepages.com/WebKit-sharp-0.2-1.fc9.src.rpm
Description: This package provides Mono bindings for WebKit libraries

rpmlint says :
[builder@mathieu SPECS]$ rpmlint /home/builder/rpmbuild/RPMS/i386/WebKit-sharp-*
WebKit-sharp.i386: E: no-binary
WebKit-sharp.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
WebKit-sharp-devel.i386: W: no-documentation
WebKit-sharp-doc.i386: W: no-documentation
WebKit-sharp-doc.i386: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 2 warnings.
[builder@mathieu SPECS]$ rpmlint /home/builder/rpmbuild/SRPMS/WebKit-sharp-0.2-1.fc9.src.rpm 
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

Also, I think only-non-binary-in-usr-lib and no-binary errors can be ignored for mono packages.

Note that mock builds are good for fedora-9-i386 and fedora-rawhide-i386.

It's not my first review request, but I need a sponsor.
(see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454207)

Comment 1 David Nielsen 2009-02-24 14:15:22 UTC
Are you still interested in this package? I ask because I have submitted the same one but I see yours predates mine. I will be happy to review your work if you still want to maintain this component.

Comment 2 Mathieu BONIFACE 2009-02-24 16:22:51 UTC
I'm not particularly interested to maintain this package now, consequently you can take it.
In fact I've proposed it because it was a dependence for « galaxium messenger », but the project seems dead.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.