Bug 456843

Summary: Erroneous unversioned-explicit-obsoletes inside macro def
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Sean Flanigan <sflaniga>
Component: rpmlintAssignee: Ville Skyttä <ville.skytta>
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 9CC: manuel.wolfshant, tmz
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i386   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-10-31 10:25:24 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
Example spec file which produces unversioned-explicit-obsoletes warning none

Description Sean Flanigan 2008-07-28 02:32:09 UTC 
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.0.1) Gecko/2008071615 Fedora/3.0.1-1.fc9 Firefox/3.0.1

Description of problem:
rpmlint seems to be giving an invalid unversioned-explicit-obsoletes warning on my spec file.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
rpmlint-0.83-1.fc9.noarch

How reproducible:
Always


Steps to Reproduce:
1.rpmlint eclipse-nls.spec


Actual Results:
I got the error "eclipse-nls.spec:36: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes \"

Expected Results:
No error message, at least for that line of the spec file.

Additional info:
The spec file line in question does contain a version:

Obsoletes:  eclipse-sdk-nls-%1 <= 3.2.1 \

The backslash at the end is there because this is part of a multi-line macro definition.  See the attachment.
Comment 1 Sean Flanigan 2008-07-28 02:33:59 UTC 
Created attachment 312747 [details]
Example spec file which produces unversioned-explicit-obsoletes warning
Comment 2 Ville Skyttä 2008-07-30 16:50:16 UTC 
rpmlint probably has quite a few other potential issues with multiline macro
definitions, but I put a hack for this specific case upstream; this will
probably be in the next upstream post 0.84 release: 
http://rpmlint.zarb.org/cgi-bin/trac.cgi/changeset/1447
Comment 3 Fedora Update System 2008-10-23 20:54:18 UTC 
rpmlint-0.85-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rpmlint-0.85-1.fc9
Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2008-10-24 23:49:27 UTC 
rpmlint-0.85-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
 If you want to test the update, you can install it with 
 su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update rpmlint'.  You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2008-9125
Comment 5 Sean Flanigan 2008-10-27 00:02:49 UTC 
Looks good to me.
Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2008-10-31 10:25:02 UTC 
rpmlint-0.85-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2008-11-04 17:37:05 UTC 
rpmlint-0.85-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rpmlint-0.85-2.fc10
Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2008-11-22 16:55:31 UTC 
rpmlint-0.85-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.