Bug 457161
Summary: | RFE: Update dbmail to 3.0.0 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Rajesh Krishnan <raj.dev.redhat> | ||||||
Component: | dbmail | Assignee: | Bernard Johnson <bjohnson> | ||||||
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||||
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |||||||
Priority: | low | ||||||||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | alex, notting | ||||||
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature, Patch | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||||
URL: | http://dbmail.org/ | ||||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |||||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||
Last Closed: | 2011-01-16 00:04:54 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||
Embargoed: | |||||||||
Bug Depends On: | 474044 | ||||||||
Bug Blocks: | |||||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Rajesh Krishnan
2008-07-29 23:02:38 UTC
Created attachment 312945 [details]
dbmail-2.3.3-2.fc10.src.rpm
Created attachment 312946 [details]
SPEC for dbmail 2.3.3
Change the dbmail-2.3.3-2.spec to dbmail.spec before using to compile package
(keeps rpmlint happy).
dbmail is already in Fedora - this should be an enhancement request for the existing package rather than a new package review request. Where do you specify the enhancement request? I don't see any such option here. -Rajesh FutureFeature keyword indicated enhancement request It looks like the most recent is actually 2.3.5 now. However I believe the 2.3.x is unstable series which is probably why it hasn't been upgraded in Fedora as yet. (In reply to comment #6) > However I believe the 2.3.x is unstable series which is probably why it hasn't > been upgraded in Fedora as yet. Right, the schema has been in flux. I believe with 2.3.5 there will be no more changes though. |