Bug 457161 - RFE: Update dbmail to 3.0.0
Summary: RFE: Update dbmail to 3.0.0
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: dbmail
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
low
low
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Bernard Johnson
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: http://dbmail.org/
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 474044
Blocks:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2008-07-29 23:02 UTC by Rajesh Krishnan
Modified: 2011-01-16 00:04 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2011-01-16 00:04:54 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
dbmail-2.3.3-2.fc10.src.rpm (880.88 KB, application/x-rpm)
2008-07-29 23:02 UTC, Rajesh Krishnan
no flags Details
SPEC for dbmail 2.3.3 (12.17 KB, text/plain)
2008-07-29 23:04 UTC, Rajesh Krishnan
no flags Details


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Red Hat Bugzilla 456955 0 low CLOSED Review-Request: libzdb - Zild Database Library 2021-02-22 00:41:40 UTC

Description Rajesh Krishnan 2008-07-29 23:02:38 UTC
Description of problem:
New SRPM and SPEC for dbmail 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
2.3.3

How reproducible:
SRPM and SPEC attached.

Steps to Reproduce:
1.  
2.
3.
  
Actual results:
Builds fine on fedora-rawhide (fc10) environment (tested on amd64).

Expected results:


Additional info:
1. Need to define QA_RPATHS=$[ 0x0001|0x0010 ] for the rpmbuild command line.
2. The new version of dbmail depends on libzdb-2.2.2 (see 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456955 for more info).

Comment 1 Rajesh Krishnan 2008-07-29 23:02:38 UTC
Created attachment 312945 [details]
dbmail-2.3.3-2.fc10.src.rpm

Comment 2 Rajesh Krishnan 2008-07-29 23:04:33 UTC
Created attachment 312946 [details]
SPEC for dbmail 2.3.3

Change the dbmail-2.3.3-2.spec to dbmail.spec before using to compile package
(keeps rpmlint happy).

Comment 3 Paul Howarth 2008-07-30 12:31:24 UTC
dbmail is already in Fedora - this should be an enhancement request for the
existing package rather than a new package review request.

Comment 4 Rajesh Krishnan 2008-07-30 20:38:08 UTC
Where do you specify the enhancement request?  I don't see any such option 
here.
-Rajesh


Comment 5 John Poelstra 2008-10-17 22:28:49 UTC
FutureFeature keyword indicated enhancement request

Comment 6 Alex Lancaster 2009-03-15 08:15:59 UTC
It looks like the most recent is actually 2.3.5 now.  

However I believe the 2.3.x is unstable series which is probably why it hasn't been upgraded in Fedora as yet.

Comment 7 Bernard Johnson 2009-03-16 04:00:56 UTC
(In reply to comment #6)
> However I believe the 2.3.x is unstable series which is probably why it hasn't
> been upgraded in Fedora as yet.  

Right, the schema has been in flux.  I believe with 2.3.5 there will be no more changes though.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.