Bug 459359

Summary: BROWSE_MODE isn't a mode it is a feature
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: JW <ohtmvyyn>
Component: autofsAssignee: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer>
Status: CLOSED UPSTREAM QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 8CC: ikent
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-08-26 12:29:37 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description JW 2008-08-17 13:39:50 UTC
Description of problem:
The autofs config file has a poorly documented variable BROWSE_MODE. The inline documentation states "maps are browsable by default". Ok, so why isn't the variable named BROWSEABLE?  Because BROWSE_MODE seems to indicate a choice of modes, such as "BROWSE_MODE=mode1" or "BROWSE_MODE=mode2".  But instead it is "BROWSE_MODE=no" ... which seems to be a strange name for a mode!

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
autofs-5.0.2-16

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.  see description

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Jeff Moyer 2008-08-26 12:29:37 UTC
I think you're splitting hairs.  If you want this changed, then I'd advise you to submit a patch upstream, and make sure that it maintains backwards compatibility.  The linux autofs mailing list is autofs@linux.kernel.org.

I hope this helps.

Cheers,

Jeff

Comment 2 JW 2008-08-26 12:45:07 UTC
Thanks for your expert advice. As if RedHat never split hairs!

Why is it that such a magnificent and innovative corporation like RedHat has not yet discovered a way of automatically linking their bug reports with "upstream" bug reporting facilities? Truly remarkable!

Comment 3 Jeff Moyer 2008-08-26 12:55:38 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> Thanks for your expert advice. As if RedHat never split hairs!

> Why is it that such a magnificent and innovative corporation like RedHat has
> not yet discovered a way of automatically linking their bug reports with
> "upstream" bug reporting facilities? Truly remarkable!

We do have the ability to link to upstream bugzilla databases.  However,
the upstream bug reporting facility for autofs is the autofs mailing list.  I have not filed the report upstream for you because I feel you would do a better job stating your position than I.

Cheers,

Jeff