Bug 460307
Summary: | Removing openldap-devel breaks sudo command | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | Reporter: | Jan Safranek <jsafrane> |
Component: | openldap | Assignee: | Jan Safranek <jsafrane> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 5.3 | CC: | jplans, psklenar, rvokal |
Target Milestone: | rc | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2009-01-20 20:53:29 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Jan Safranek
2008-08-27 14:15:51 UTC
This request was evaluated by Red Hat Product Management for inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux maintenance release. Product Management has requested further review of this request by Red Hat Engineering, for potential inclusion in a Red Hat Enterprise Linux Update release for currently deployed products. This request is not yet committed for inclusion in an Update release. Apart from the problem described above, OpenLDAP uses libldap.so as name of ldap library and it confuses ldconfig - it can create links during package update as follows: libldap-2.3.so.0 -> libldap.so /usr/lib64/libldap.so -> libldap-2.3.so.0.2.31 The same applies to libldap and libldap_r. This is perfectly working, only "rpm -V openldap" complains about wrong links: ....L... /usr/lib64/liblber-2.3.so.0 ....L... /usr/lib64/libldap-2.3.so.0 ....L... /usr/lib64/libldap_r-2.3.so.0 The correct way how to fix it is to rename libldap.so to libldap-2.3.so, but doing that might break customers setup, they are used to have libldap.so. An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-0090.html |