Bug 461106
| Summary: | Review Request: libnotifymm - C++ interface for libnotify | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Denis Leroy <denis> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Jason Tibbitts <j> |
| Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-package-review, notting |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | j:
fedora-review+
kevin: fedora-cvs+ |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2009-01-14 10:21:00 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Denis Leroy
2008-09-04 08:51:28 UTC
Failed to build on rawhide test box x86_64. Snippet from build log:
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DG_LOG_DOMAIN=\"libnotifymm\" -I../../libnotify -I../../libnotify -I/usr/include/glibmm-2.4 -I/usr/lib64/glibmm-2.4/include -I/usr/include/sigc++-2.0 -I/usr/lib64/sigc++-2.0/include -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib64/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/gtkmm-2.4 -I/usr/lib64/gtkmm-2.4/include -I/usr/include/giomm-2.4 -I/usr/lib64/giomm-2.4/include -I/usr/include/gdkmm-2.4 -I/usr/lib64/gdkmm-2.4/include -I/usr/include/pangomm-1.4 -I/usr/include/atkmm-1.6 -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib64/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/cairomm-1.0 -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/dbus-1.0 -I/usr/lib64/dbus-1.0/include -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -c notify.cc -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/notify.o
notification.cc: In static member function 'static void Notify::Notification_Class::class_init_function(void*, void*)':
notification.cc:168: error: invalid conversion from 'void (*)(NotifyNotification*)' to 'void (*)(NotifyNotification*, gint)'
notification.cc: In static member function 'static void Notify::Notification_Class::closed_callback(NotifyNotification*)':
notification.cc:214: error: too few arguments to function
notification.cc: In member function 'virtual void Notify::Notification::on_closed()':
notification.cc:477: error: too few arguments to function
make[4]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/libnotifymm-0.6.1/libnotify/libnotifymm'
make[3]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/libnotifymm-0.6.1/libnotify/libnotifymm'
make[4]: *** [notification.lo] Error 1
make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/libnotifymm-0.6.1/libnotify'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/libnotifymm-0.6.1/libnotify'
make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
RPM build errors:
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.8NC4b5 (%build)
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.8NC4b5 (%build)
Child returncode was: 1
EXCEPTION: Command failed. See logs for output.
# ['bash', '--login', '-c', 'rpmbuild -bb --target x86_64 --nodeps builddir/build/SPECS/libnotifymm.spec']
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/mock/trace_decorator.py", line 70, in trace
result = func(*args, **kw)
File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/mock/util.py", line 316, in do
raise mock.exception.Error, ("Command failed. See logs for output.\n # %s" % (command,), child.returncode)
Error: Command failed. See logs for output.
# ['bash', '--login', '-c', 'rpmbuild -bb --target x86_64 --nodeps builddir/build/SPECS/libnotifymm.spec']
LEAVE do --> EXCEPTION RAISED
*!@#$, rawhide package includes an API-breaking patch. Here's the fix, but this will only build on rawhide. For F-9, comment out the first patch from the spec file. Spec URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/libnotifymm.spec SRPM URL: http://www.poolshark.org/src/libnotifymm-0.6.1-2.fc10.src.rpm Sorry nobody's looked at this in a while, but I just tried to build on current rawhide (x86_64) and got: notification.cc: In static member function 'static void Notify::Notification_Class::class_init_function(void*, void*)': notification.cc:192: error: invalid conversion from 'void (*)(NotifyNotification*, gint)' to 'void (*)(NotifyNotification*)' notification.cc: In static member function 'static void Notify::Notification_Class::closed_callback(NotifyNotification*, gint)': notification.cc:238: error: too many arguments to function notification.cc: In member function 'virtual void Notify::Notification::on_closed(gint)': notification.cc:501: error: too many arguments to function It does build fine on F-10, though, and there's no requirement for a package to build on rawhide in order to be reviewed, although of course you'll want to get it building relatively soon. There are a pile of rpmlint unused-direct-shlib-dependency complaints, against things like libgtk-x11 and libatk. I don't think these are especially problematic as those libraries will be in memory anyway, but they're trivially fixed with the usual one-liner: sed -i -e 's! -shared ! -Wl,--as-needed\0!g' libtool after the %configure call. With that, rpmlint is silent. Note that the examples are GPL, not LGPL, but they aren't installed so there's no issue. Really I don't see anything which should block approval of this package. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: fea7f6f7e436d343a14ceed749b5e9ad78e34c0a62c7790520710de5236c402f libnotifymm-0.6.1.tar.bz2 * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (F-10, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. O rpmlint has some fixable complaints which aren't blockers. * final provides and requires are sane: libnotifymm-0.6.1-2.fc10.x86_64.rpm libnotifymm-1.0.so.7()(64bit) libnotifymm = 0.6.1-2.fc10 libnotifymm(x86-64) = 0.6.1-2.fc10 = /sbin/ldconfig libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libglibmm-2.4.so.1()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libnotify.so.1()(64bit) libnotifymm-1.0.so.7()(64bit) libsigc-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit) libnotifymm-devel-0.6.1-2.fc10.x86_64.rpm pkgconfig(libnotifymm-1.0) = 0.6.1 libnotifymm-devel = 0.6.1-2.fc10 libnotifymm-devel(x86-64) = 0.6.1-2.fc10 = gtkmm24-devel libnotify-devel libnotifymm = 0.6.1-2.fc10 libnotifymm-1.0.so.7()(64bit) pkgconfig * shared libraries installed: ldconfig called properly. unversioned .so link is in the -devel package. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files. * scriptlets are OK (ldconfig). * code, not content. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * headers are in the -devel package. * pkgconfig are in the -devel package; pkgconfig dependency is present. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. APPROVED The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package reviews recently, please consider doing one. Tibbs, thanks for the review. I'll fix the rpmlint warning and devel build issue. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libnotifymm Short Description: C++ interface for libnotify Owners: denis Branches: F-9 F-10 InitialCC: cvs done. Did you want to get this built and pushed out? I see an F-10 build, but no rawhide or F-9 builds and no update notice. Yes, had to figure out why it didn't build on rawhide. Fixed now, thanks. |