Bug 461708
Summary: | unsupported "developer content relevant" tags | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Community] Publican | Reporter: | Dana Mison <dmison> |
Component: | publican | Assignee: | Jeff Fearn 🐞 <jfearn> |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Michael Hideo <mhideo> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 2.0 | CC: | bforte, mmcallis, publican-list |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Documentation |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | 0.39 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2008-11-13 05:42:04 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Dana Mison
2008-09-10 01:23:32 UTC
Do these tags render correctly in html, html-single and PDF? Do the html-single and html outputs pass validation for XHTML 1.0 strict at http://validator.w3.org ? They just render as normal text, no special formatting. The upstream source for a couple of my books have a lot of these tags as they are developer guides, and it produces *a lot* of warnings. It's not a big-deal, but *some* formatting for those would be nice. Darrin, do the html-single and html outputs pass validation for XHTML 1.0 strict at http://validator.w3.org ? Brian, should these tags be mono-spaced bold or proportional bold? Validated output of type, methodname, exceptionname, varname, interfacename. publican-0.39-0.fc9, publican-fedora-0.16-0.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |