Bug 461708

Summary: unsupported "developer content relevant" tags
Product: [Community] Publican Reporter: Dana Mison <dmison>
Component: publicanAssignee: Jeff Fearn <jfearn>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Michael Hideo <mhideo>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 2.0CC: bforte, mmcallis, publican-list
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Documentation
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Fixed In Version: 0.39 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-11-13 00:42:04 EST Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Description Dana Mison 2008-09-09 21:23:32 EDT
version: publican-0.36-5.el5

Description of problem:
The following valid docbook tags produce warnings that are reported as unsupported: 

type, methodname, exceptionname, varname, interfacename

warning message as follows:

*WARNING: Unknown tag: methodname*
This tag may not be displayed correctly, may generate invalid xhtml, or may breach Section 508 Accessibility standards.
Comment 1 Jeff Fearn 2008-10-07 21:24:59 EDT
Do these tags render correctly in html, html-single and PDF?

Do the html-single and html outputs pass validation for XHTML 1.0 strict at http://validator.w3.org ?
Comment 2 Dana Mison 2008-10-07 21:33:18 EDT
They just render as normal text, no special formatting.

The upstream source for a couple of my books have a lot of these tags as they are developer guides, and it produces *a lot* of warnings.

It's not a big-deal, but *some* formatting for those would be nice.
Comment 3 Jeff Fearn 2008-10-07 21:47:13 EDT
Darrin, do the html-single and html outputs pass validation for XHTML 1.0 strict at http://validator.w3.org ?

Brian, should these tags be mono-spaced bold or proportional bold?
Comment 4 Jeff Fearn 2008-11-13 00:42:04 EST
Validated output of type, methodname, exceptionname, varname, interfacename.
Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2009-01-14 21:56:26 EST
publican-0.39-0.fc9, publican-fedora-0.16-0.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.