version: publican-0.36-5.el5 Description of problem: The following valid docbook tags produce warnings that are reported as unsupported: type, methodname, exceptionname, varname, interfacename warning message as follows: *WARNING: Unknown tag: methodname* This tag may not be displayed correctly, may generate invalid xhtml, or may breach Section 508 Accessibility standards.
Do these tags render correctly in html, html-single and PDF? Do the html-single and html outputs pass validation for XHTML 1.0 strict at http://validator.w3.org ?
They just render as normal text, no special formatting. The upstream source for a couple of my books have a lot of these tags as they are developer guides, and it produces *a lot* of warnings. It's not a big-deal, but *some* formatting for those would be nice.
Darrin, do the html-single and html outputs pass validation for XHTML 1.0 strict at http://validator.w3.org ? Brian, should these tags be mono-spaced bold or proportional bold?
Validated output of type, methodname, exceptionname, varname, interfacename.
publican-0.39-0.fc9, publican-fedora-0.16-0.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.