Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 461708
unsupported "developer content relevant" tags
Last modified: 2010-11-23 22:58:12 EST
Description of problem:
The following valid docbook tags produce warnings that are reported as unsupported:
type, methodname, exceptionname, varname, interfacename
warning message as follows:
*WARNING: Unknown tag: methodname*
This tag may not be displayed correctly, may generate invalid xhtml, or may breach Section 508 Accessibility standards.
Do these tags render correctly in html, html-single and PDF?
Do the html-single and html outputs pass validation for XHTML 1.0 strict at http://validator.w3.org ?
They just render as normal text, no special formatting.
The upstream source for a couple of my books have a lot of these tags as they are developer guides, and it produces *a lot* of warnings.
It's not a big-deal, but *some* formatting for those would be nice.
Darrin, do the html-single and html outputs pass validation for XHTML 1.0 strict at http://validator.w3.org ?
Brian, should these tags be mono-spaced bold or proportional bold?
Validated output of type, methodname, exceptionname, varname, interfacename.
publican-0.39-0.fc9, publican-fedora-0.16-0.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.