Bug 461913
Summary: | BIND 9.5.0-P2 fails to start up - 'files' limit (128) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Wolfgang Rupprecht <wolfgang.rupprecht> | ||||
Component: | bind | Assignee: | Adam Tkac <atkac> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | medium | ||||||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | atkac, ovasik | ||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2008-09-22 13:14:53 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Wolfgang Rupprecht
2008-09-11 12:16:50 UTC
I'm not able to reproduce problem on my machine. Could you please attach output from "strace /usr/sbin/named -gunamed", please? Thanks Created attachment 316453 [details]
strace output
attached is the strace output from a failed run
Hm, strace says ... getrlimit(RLIMIT_NOFILE, {rlim_cur=128, rlim_max=128}) = 0 ... It seems you have to configured to small open files limit by default. Would it be possible try increase it, please? This change (= checking of open files limit) was needed due recent CVE-2008-1447 and performance problems. I can certainly increase the limit via the named.conf config file (and have done so to get it running). I'm just concerned that the compiled in limits as delivered by the fedora RPM don't set a good initial value. The error message leads me to believe that the correct initial compiled in value should be 1024 (FD_SETSIZE). This problem is due bug #461458 in kernel. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 461458 *** |