Bug 463540

Summary: glabels-batch broken in 2.2.2. wrong page size
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Greg Diebel <gregd>
Component: glabelsAssignee: Peter Gordon <peter>
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 9CC: gregd, jspaleta, peter
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: 2.2.3 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-09-25 00:06:53 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Greg Diebel 2008-09-23 20:47:39 UTC
Description of problem:
glabels-batch does not use default page size. FIXED IN 2.2.3 PLEASE backport from fc10.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
2.2.2

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. glabels-batch -o "test" -i "testcsv.csv" avery5160.glabels
2. view or print test pdf
  
Actual results:
note that the page size is wrong

Expected results:
should use template page size or default to system page size

Additional info:

Comment 1 Peter Gordon 2008-09-24 01:51:29 UTC
Thanks for your bug report. 

Packages for 2.2.3 are in the testing repositories and have been submitted as stable updates (Fedora 8: FEDORA-2008-7255, Fedora 9: FEDORA-2008-7379).

These should hit the repositories very soon; but until then you can install them from the testing repository. ("yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey upgrade glabels" as root.)

Comment 2 Fedora Update System 2008-09-25 00:06:51 UTC
glabels-2.2.3-1.fc8 has been pushed to the Fedora 8 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 3 Fedora Update System 2008-09-25 00:22:42 UTC
glabels-2.2.3-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.