Bug 463944

Summary: rpm writes error : File not found by glob: and return code = 0
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Reporter: Petr Sklenar <psklenar>
Component: rpmAssignee: Panu Matilainen <pmatilai>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: BaseOS QE <qe-baseos-auto>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 5.2CC: alexp, syeghiay
Target Milestone: beta   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-01-20 20:49:10 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Petr Sklenar 2008-09-25 16:30:28 UTC
Description of problem:
rpm writes error but return code is zero

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
rpm-4.4.2.3-5.el5

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. i didnt mounted any folder, so file wasnt on that path
2. 
#rpm -Uv  /mnt/redhat/brewroot/packages/openssl/0.9.8b/8.3.el5/x86_64/openssl-0.9.8b-8.3.el5.*.rpm 
error: File not found by glob: /mnt/redhat/brewroot/packages/openssl/0.9.8b/8.3.el5/x86_64/openssl-0.9.8b-8.3.el5.*.rpm
3. echo $?
0 

4. in folder /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/x86_64/ is nothing:

#rpm -Uvh  /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/`uname -i`/*
error: File not found by glob: /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/x86_64/*
# echo $?
0


Actual results:

it writes echo $?=0 during error

Expected results:
return code should be nonzero

Additional info:

Comment 1 Panu Matilainen 2008-09-26 07:55:33 UTC
*** Bug 446202 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 2 Panu Matilainen 2008-09-26 07:57:12 UTC
Fixed upstream so patch already exists, easy fix.

Comment 12 errata-xmlrpc 2009-01-20 20:49:10 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-0079.html