Bug 464757
Summary: | Review Request: openssl-tpm-engine - OpenSSL engine for TSS API | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | David Woodhouse <dwmw2> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Rajiv Andrade <srajiv> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-package-review, key, notting, srajiv, tmraz, tomspur |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2012-06-29 22:01:56 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 201449 |
Description
David Woodhouse
2008-09-30 10:21:58 UTC
I am probably a poor choice of maintainer for this package. Does anyone with more clue want it? New patch to store TSS key 'blobs' in a text file rather than in a separate binary-only file, so that users can have a single '.pem' file with their identity, as they can without the TPM. If the trousers-tech list ever accepts my subscription attempt, I'll post it there. http://david.woodhou.se/openssl-tpm-engine-privkey-pem.patch Spec URL: http://david.woodhou.se/openssl-tpm-engine.spec SRPM URL: http://david.woodhou.se/openssl-tpm-engine-0.4.1-2.fc10.src.rpm Hi David, I can't see you subscription request to trousers-tech neither a post from you awaiting approval, did I miss something? Thanks I've just tried again, at https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/subscribe/trousers-tech I haven't tried posting there, but I did post to trousers-users on the 25th of September, subject 'TPM support in my application'. That doesn't appear in the archives either (but if you find it, don't bother; I have patches for most of it now). Would you like to own the openssl-tpm-engine package? I could only be a package-monkey for it, not a real maintainer. Fixed tspi library handling so it doesn't depend on trousers-devel, but only on trousers, and that dependency is picked up properly by RPM. Spec URL: http://david.woodhou.se/openssl-tpm-engine.spec SRPM URL: http://david.woodhou.se/openssl-tpm-engine-0.4.1-4.fc9.src.rpm Another old one; unfortunately it fails to build: + aclocal + automake --add-missing -c --foreign Makefile.am:5: Libtool library used but `LIBTOOL' is undefined Makefile.am:5: The usual way to define `LIBTOOL' is to add `AC_PROG_LIBTOOL' Makefile.am:5: to `configure.in' and run `aclocal' and `autoconf' again. Makefile.am:5: If `AC_PROG_LIBTOOL' is in `configure.in', make sure Makefile.am:5: its definition is in aclocal's search path. error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.9uMxE4 (%build) Here is a different build error: ./libtool: line 775: X--tag=CC: command not found ./libtool: line 808: libtool: ignoring unknown tag : command not found ./libtool: line 775: X--mode=compile: command not found ./libtool: line 925: *** Warning: inferring the mode of operation is deprecated.: command not found ./libtool: line 926: *** Future versions of Libtool will require --mode=MODE be specified.: command not found and many more... David, are you still working on this? Ew, libtool. I think I'll rewrite it to use proper Makefiles instead. Yes, I'd still like this to go in. Indicating that this doesn't build; please clear the whiteboard when that's been fixed. This is still marked as not building. Can we fix that up or close this ticket out? The autohell problems are the least of my worries right now -- when I make it build against OpenSSL 1.0.0 it doesn't _work_ either. http://www.mail-archive.com/trousers-tech@lists.sourceforge.net/msg00024.html I'm working on it, but slowly. And, after a few days short of a year, still marked as not building. I saw that something happened back in April but I don't know if there's still any desire to get this package in. |