Bug 465203
Summary: | RFE: Upgrade bouncycastle to the latest version | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Orcan Ogetbil <oget.fedora> |
Component: | bouncycastle | Assignee: | Lillian Angel <langel> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | langel |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2008-10-02 16:05:19 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 465511 |
Description
Orcan Ogetbil
2008-10-02 05:25:13 UTC
Upgraded bouncycastle to 1.41. Should be in rawhide within the next couple of days I decided to take over bcmail by packaging it as bouncycastle-mail. But I have one question that concerns both bouncycastle and bouncycastle-mail. Does bouncycastle really have BSD license (as I saw in the spec file of last package in koji)? Please observe: http://www.bouncycastle.org/licence.html This license file can be found in both bcprov and bcmail tarballs. Sounds like it's a variant of the MIT X11 license, i.e. it should actually say License: MIT, not License: BSD. |