Bug 465347
Summary: | fedora-release-notes timewarped back to 8.92??!? | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Valdis Kletnieks <valdis.kletnieks> |
Component: | fedora-release-notes | Assignee: | Paul W. Frields <stickster> |
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | dcantrell, stickster |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2008-10-06 21:19:54 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Valdis Kletnieks
2008-10-02 20:56:29 UTC
This happens during the brief period between Beta and the Preview Release, when documentation produces a preview of the true F10 Release Notes. Because of an artifact of the versioning of the tarball archives we create, we can't produce a 9.92 version until there are truly 9.92 tarballs available. That should happen in a few weeks. Until then, what looks like a version regression can simply be ignored. Oh, OK.. long as it's a known issue. :) What really threw me was that the Description: part of the RPM said 'for Fedora 8' rather than either 9 or 10... |