Bug 465891
Summary: | Depending on java-1.6.0-openjdk instead of java >= 1:1.6.0 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Muayyad Alsadi <alsadi> | |
Component: | netbeans | Assignee: | Victor G. Vasilyev <victor.vasilyev> | |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | ||
Priority: | medium | |||
Version: | 10 | CC: | victor.vasilyev | |
Target Milestone: | --- | |||
Target Release: | --- | |||
Hardware: | All | |||
OS: | Linux | |||
Whiteboard: | ||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | ||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | ||
Clone Of: | ||||
: | 620330 (view as bug list) | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2009-01-12 12:58:20 UTC | Type: | --- | |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | ||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | ||
Embargoed: | ||||
Bug Depends On: | ||||
Bug Blocks: | 620330, 620331 |
Description
Muayyad Alsadi
2008-10-06 23:37:45 UTC
Hi Muayyad, I absolutely agree that the netbeans-java2-6.1 package should not explicitly depend on the java-1.6.0-openjdk package. But, it was my wrong attempt to establish dependency on JDK (not JRE!). There is related Bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464558 . Both bugs (this and #464558) are fixed by means of replacing the dependency on java-1.6.0-openjdk with java-sdk. In result: $ rpm -qp -R netbeans-java2-6.1-7.fc10.noarch.rpm ... java >= 1:1.6.0 java-sdk >= 1:1.6.0 ... Note, the netbeans-java2 subpackage requires both java and java-sdk, because it doesn't make any assumptions about possible packaging of both JRE and JDK and relations between their packages. E.g. such solution will work properly even if both java and java-sdk will be provided by one package. Successful koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=866444 This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping thanks, it worked for me sorry for being late I changed the status to closed currentrelease is this correct ? Thanks, Muayyad. I think the status is correct, because FC9 is actually the current release now. Sorry I've typo. I meant FC10 is the current release. |