Bug 467311
| Summary: | power6 tuned libraries have mismatch in rtld_global_ro size | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Josh Boyer <jwboyer> | ||||
| Component: | glibc | Assignee: | Jakub Jelinek <jakub> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | medium | ||||||
| Version: | 10 | CC: | alromanoit, bugproxy, drepper, jakub, jens.osterkamp, jlaska | ||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | powerpc | ||||||
| OS: | Linux | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2009-10-20 13:04:53 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Bug Depends On: | |||||||
| Bug Blocks: | 438944 | ||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Josh Boyer
2008-10-16 19:42:01 UTC
*** Bug 467474 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Should be fixed in glibc-2.8.90-14, please check it out. =Comment: #0================================================= When trying to install Fedora 10 Beta into a LPAR on a JS22 blade, system fails to boot from the installed disk. Here are the steps I used to do this : 1. boot LPAR from DVD iso image. 2. at yaboot prompt, choose linux (default) 3. follow the normal installation process, that is - configure disks - select timezone - select packages to be installed - ... 4. install packages onto disk 5. installation ends with a window offering to reboot. 6. reboot After reboot firmware fails to detect hardware. This is due to an empty PReP partition. When attaching the disk to a different to find out what had actually gone wrong I found a (at best) incomplete installation : - a lot of packages were missing - some were installed incompletely In the installation log I found the following messages : Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-close.c: 719: _dl_close: Assertion `map->l_init_called' failed! Installing zlib-1.2.3-18.fc9.ppc Not only for glibc but for a lot of other packages installed after glibc. I will attach a full log to this bug. In my interpretation the root cause for this seems to be in some problem in glibc on power6 and everything after that is just a symptom of an incomplete installation. So maybe this bug should rather be "glibc breaks installation on power6" ? =Comment: #1================================================= Jens Osterkamp <jens.com> - install.log from failed installation =Comment: #2================================================= Maybe I should add that RHEL5u2 is running in a different LPAR on the same machine without problems. I also have Fedora 10 Beta running on a different (QS2x) cell blade without problems. I conclude it must be something unique to this machine (JS22). *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 467311 *** Created attachment 320858 [details]
install.log from failed installation
What glibc version is the IBM report for? It's useless in the current form. The problem was that hp-timing.h defined HP_TIMING_AVAIL only for power4 and power6 configured glibc, in rawhide ld.so comes from the base (pre-power4) build and /lib/power6/ libc.so, libm.so, libpthread.so, librt.so come from power6 build, which means ld.so disagreed on _rtld_global* offsets with the power6 libs. I've nuked the 32-bit powerpc hp-timing stuff for fedora builds, they are usable for RHEL which now ships with base libs for *.a/*.o only and has power4 ld.so and shared libraries in /lib plus extra power6 libraries in /lib/power6. installed snap3 from network, problem is fixed, closing. I found the same problem with Fedora 9 installation on a JS22 LPAR. Is it possible to fix it also in the FC9 tree? Thank you This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping |