Bug 470688

Summary: Request for rubygems >= 1.3.0, merb uninstallable with v.1.2.0
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Jesse Hutton <jesse.hutton>
Component: rubygemsAssignee: David Lutterkort <lutter>
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 10CC: hbrock, lutter, mastahnke, vanmeeuwen+fedora
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-12-18 00:42:28 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
Spec file for rubygems-1.3.1-1.fc9.noarch
none
Patch against rubygems-1.3.1.tgz for a noarch gemdir
none
rubygems-1.3.1.fc9 SRPM none

Description Jesse Hutton 2008-11-08 21:16:58 UTC 
Description of problem:

rubygems >= 1.3.0 is required for Merb, the newly released ruby web framework, and thus Merb is unstallable

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): all


How reproducible: 100%


Steps to Reproduce:
1. type 'gem install merb --source http://edge.merbivore.com'
2.
3.
  
Actual results: dependency error notifying of rubygems >= 1.3.0 requirment


Expected results: successful installation of merb


Additional info: I tried modifying the srcrpm for 1.2x but wasn't successful. It seems that there were some changes in the setup. I also posted to fedora-devel giving a bit more context: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-November/msg00424.html
Comment 1 Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-11-09 00:40:20 UTC 
Created attachment 322977 [details]
Spec file for rubygems-1.3.1-1.fc9.noarch

Attaching spec file for rubygems-1.3.1-1.fc9.noarch
Comment 2 Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-11-09 00:41:18 UTC 
Created attachment 322978 [details]
Patch against rubygems-1.3.1.tgz for a noarch gemdir

Attaching noarch patch
Comment 3 Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-11-09 00:42:04 UTC 
Created attachment 322979 [details]
rubygems-1.3.1.fc9 SRPM

Attaching SRPM
Comment 4 Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-11-09 00:42:54 UTC 
The above has been tested only very basically (gem list, gem update, gem install).

rpmlint is silent
Comment 5 Jesse Hutton 2008-11-09 02:27:59 UTC 
Thanks a lot, Jeroen. Merb 1.0 installed fine and everything seems to be working well :)
Comment 6 Jeroen van Meeuwen 2008-11-09 11:13:00 UTC 
David, can I make this go to F-10 and devel at the very least? Please advice on whether or not to push it out to EL-5.
Comment 7 Bug Zapper 2008-11-26 05:04:18 UTC 
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle.
Changing version to '10'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
Comment 8 David Lutterkort 2008-12-12 20:02:37 UTC 
(In reply to comment #6)
> David, can I make this go to F-10 and devel at the very least? Please advice on
> whether or not to push it out to EL-5.

Sorry, this bz fell into some mail filter. Yes, please push this out to F-10, devel, and EL-5
Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2008-12-13 13:00:16 UTC 
rubygems-1.3.1-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygems-1.3.1-1.fc10
Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2008-12-18 00:42:25 UTC 
rubygems-1.3.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.