Bug 471666
Summary: | Fresh install brings in glibc-devel.i386 on x86_64 system. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Orion Poplawski <orion> |
Component: | gcc | Assignee: | Jakub Jelinek <jakub> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 10 | CC: | ffesti, jakub, james.antill, katzj, pmatilai, tim.lauridsen |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2009-08-03 09:21:47 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Orion Poplawski
2008-11-14 22:00:09 UTC
That would be an anaconda or yum bug. This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping This is a brand new install from anaconda w/o any yum update or yum install command run on it? Yup. At install, glibc-devel.i386 is installed: [root@berretto ~]# grep glibc install.log Installing glibc-2.9-2.i686 Installing glibc-2.9-2.x86_64 Installing glibc-common-2.9-2.x86_64 Installing glibc-headers-2.9-2.x86_64 Installing glibc-devel-2.9-2.i386 I can't find any replicators of this. Can you try it out on a rawhide or f11alpha install and see if it is still the case? Okay, I think I know what's triggering the issue. I have: glibc-devel.i386 in my kickstart file because I need it for Intel Fortran support. But I still think gcc.x86_64 should bring in glibc-devel.x86_64 since it can't build anything without it. Current discussion on fedora-devel suggests: Requires: glibc-devel%{__isa} Oops just one underscore: Requires: glibc-devel%{_isa} That's incorrect. gcc can of course build stuff even with just glibc-devel.i[56]86 installed. Of course just 32-bit, not 64-bit. |