Bug 475763

Summary: "failed to get a TID" - packagekit unusable
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: An. N <epsilon>
Component: PackageKitAssignee: Richard Hughes <richard>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: urgent Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 10CC: lmacken, rhughes, richard, robin.norwood, tuxbrewr
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-12-10 07:16:34 EST Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---

Description An. N 2008-12-10 06:44:37 EST
Description of problem:
After installing 126 updates (yes, that many were published in 1 push!), I get the following message when trying to use the gtk software installer in GNOME:

failed to get a TID: A security policy in place prevents this sender from sending this message to this recipient, see message bus configuration file (rejected message had interface "org.freedesktop.PackageKit.Transaction" member "SetLocale" error name "(unset)" destination "org.freedesktop.PackageKit") (0)

The same message appears when trying to use system update.

When using yum, I get the following error:
ERROR:dbus.proxies:Introspect error on :1.33:/org/freedesktop/PackageKit: dbus.exceptions.DBusException: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.AccessDenied: A security policy in place prevents this sender from sending this message to this recipient, see message bus configuration file (rejected message had interface "org.freedesktop.DBus.Introspectable" member "Introspect" error name "(unset)" destination ":1.33")

Package kit seems to be unusable. What a mess!


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
FC10 default after Dec 8 update

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:
Comment 1 Richard Hughes 2008-12-10 07:16:34 EST

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 475074 ***