Bug 475989

Summary: latest bluetoth services seem to not work
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Peter Janakiev <malwkgad>
Component: bluez-gnomeAssignee: Bastien Nocera <bnocera>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 10CC: bmillett, bnocera
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i386   
OS: Linux   
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-12-11 14:30:56 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description Peter Janakiev 2008-12-11 13:37:42 UTC
Description of problem:
I have upgraded the system on 8 of December with the following related packages (part of the upgrade all process)
After the upgrade when I select to connect the phone to the laptop (thinkpad X61s) no devices are found (i.e. device search fails).
I am sure it is not a hardware issue, because for testing purpose I booted into F10-live usb (the official release) and it worked great, the nokia is found immediately. I don't know which component exactly is broken, because I am not sure how this whole bluetooth thing works, so I cannot provide more details than this, if more is needed, please include directions on how to get debugging output. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Click on the bluetooth icon on the tray 
2. Select set up new device
3. Press forward button 
Actual results:
No device list is presented

Expected results:
List of devices by their name (as it used to do before the upgrade of the above denoted packages ) 

Additional info:
The is no issue with the bluetooth device on the laptop (it works with the live image) not the phone - without changing anything on it it works on live image F10 release and does not on the new version of the packages)

Comment 1 Bastien Nocera 2008-12-11 14:30:56 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 475069 ***