Bug 478609

Summary: Review Request: djmount - Mounts UPnP Audio/Video/Photo shares as FUSE filesystems.
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Avi Alkalay <avibrazil>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 10CC: cweyl, fedora-package-review, herrold, mail, martin, notting
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-06-14 12:55:28 EDT Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: ---
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 201449    

Description Avi Alkalay 2009-01-01 23:14:03 EST
Spec URL: http://avi.alkalay.net/software/djmount/
SRPM URL: http://avi.alkalay.net/software/djmount/
Mounts UPnP Audio/Video/Photo shares as FUSE filesystems.
This is specially practical when you have a Windows Media Center sharing content through UPnP.
Comment 1 Felix Kaechele 2009-01-02 12:00:33 EST
Why do I always appear in the CC list on your review requests? I don't like that so much.
Comment 2 Avi Alkalay 2009-01-02 13:38:06 EST
Felix, I think thats because I created this report copying another one that you were probably listed in the CC.
Comment 3 Fabian Affolter 2009-01-09 05:48:34 EST
Some issues are similar to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477958

- $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and %{buildroot} are mixed
- Please use 'make install ..... INSTALL="install -p"' to preserve the time stamps if possible
- %defattr(-,root,root,-) instead of %defattr(-,root,root)
- BuildRoot tag doesn't match the guidelines
Comment 4 Fabian Affolter 2009-01-09 06:22:14 EST
- License is GPLv2+
   * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
   * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
   * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
   * (at your option) any later version.
Comment 5 Fabian Affolter 2009-01-27 07:18:42 EST
Any progress on this?
Comment 6 Fabian Affolter 2009-04-20 03:22:52 EDT
Comment 7 MartinG 2009-05-21 12:08:46 EDT
I would also like to see this in Fedora
Comment 8 Mamoru TASAKA 2009-05-23 11:57:48 EDT
I will close this bug as NOTABUG if no response is
received from the reported within ONE WEEK.
Comment 9 Mamoru TASAKA 2009-06-14 12:55:28 EDT

If someone wants to import this package into Fedora, please
file a new review request and mark this bug as a duplicate
of the new one.

Thank you!