Bug 478840

Summary: multilib patch was removed, but multilib stopped working
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Michal Hlavinka <mhlavink>
Component: libtoolAssignee: Karsten Hopp <karsten>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: rawhideCC: j, karsten
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-02-18 12:23:28 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Michal Hlavinka 2009-01-05 15:26:04 UTC
Description of problem:
In Fedora 10 libtool wasn't using rpath for {/usr,}/lib64 directories, but now in rawhide with libtool 2.2, it does.

In F10 using autoreconf -f -i -v prevented libtool from using /usr/lib64 as rpath, now it's not working.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. try to make x86_64 for some package (for example ecryptfs-utils) with other rpath workarounds removed
2.
3.
  
Actual results:
rpmbuild fails because of /usr/lib64 rpath

Expected results:
libtool stops using {/usr,}/lib64 as rpath

Additional info:

Comment 1 Jason Tibbitts 2009-02-13 00:18:31 UTC
Yes, this seems to be causing packages which did not have rpath issues in F10 to acquire them after a rawhide rebuild.  Maintainers are reticent to fix these because the problem is, ostensibly, in libtool.

It seems that some of the stuff patched by libtool-1.5.24-multilib.patch is still present in its unpatched form in the current libtool 2.2.6 tree, but honestly I don't know enough about libtool to tell what part of the source is the actual libtool and which is the libtool-generated configure bits used to build it.

Comment 2 Karsten Hopp 2009-02-18 12:23:28 UTC
please try again with libtool-2.2.6-10.fc11 and reopen this bug when the problem still exists.

Comment 3 Michal Hlavinka 2009-02-18 13:51:20 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> please try again with libtool-2.2.6-10.fc11 and reopen this bug when the
> problem still exists.

works for me

Comment 4 Jason Tibbitts 2009-02-19 19:08:26 UTC
Yes, I can verify that this is fixed.