Bug 479531
| Summary: | emacs-git overrides vc-git.el provided by emacs with an inferior version | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | dann |
| Component: | git | Assignee: | Chris Wright <chrisw> |
| Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | 10 | CC: | bkearney, chrisw, jwboyer, tmz |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | 1.6.0.6-3.fc10 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2009-03-16 19:44:52 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
dann
2009-01-10 18:51:16 UTC
Looking at git.git, it seems like contrib/emacs is still seeing some activity (most recent being November 7, 2008). Is vc-git.el intended to make the emacs-git package obsolete or are they just different implementations? Should we just drop the emacs-git package from the Fedora branches or is it still useful in any ways? If it is still useful, can we install the files in emacs-git in a way that doesn't supersede the files included in emacs-common? (Are any of the git maintainers emacs users?) Of course, the emacs-git package isn't installed by default and shouldn't be required, so if it just isn't as nice as the built-in emacs support, users don't have to install it. Right? (In reply to comment #1) > Looking at git.git, it seems like contrib/emacs is still seeing some activity > (most recent being November 7, 2008). Is vc-git.el intended to make the > emacs-git package obsolete or are they just different implementations? They were the same implementations at some point, but the one included in emacs has has some additional features added... > Should we just drop the emacs-git package from the Fedora branches or is it > still useful in any ways? If it is still useful, can we install the files in > emacs-git in a way that doesn't supersede the files included in emacs-common? git.el is still useful. git-blame.el is not very useful, better functionality is provided by the vc.el + vc-git.el vc-git.el is actively bad. > Of course, the emacs-git package isn't installed by default and shouldn't be > required, so if it just isn't as nice as the built-in emacs support, users > don't have to install it. Right? git-1.6.0.6-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/git-1.6.0.6-3.fc10 git-1.6.0.6-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update git'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-2258 git-1.6.0.6-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |