Bug 480720
| Summary: | Review Request: gtkparasite - A GUI debugging tool for GTK+ applications | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Dan Horák <dan> |
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-package-review, notting |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | dan:
fedora-review+
kevin: fedora-cvs+ |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2009-01-20 22:22:22 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
2009-01-20 05:04:26 UTC
formal review is here, see the notes below: OK source files match upstream: checked with diff BAD package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. BAD license field matches the actual license. N/A license is open source-compatible. XXX License text not included upstream. XXX License text included in package. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK compiler flags are appropriate. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in mock (Rawhide/x86_64). OK debuginfo package looks complete. OK rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. N/A %check is present and all tests pass. OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK no scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. OK %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. OK no headers. OK no pkgconfig files. OK no libtool .la droppings. OK not a GUI app. - package name should reflect upstream name, eg. gtkparasite is appropriate package name here (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#General_Naming) - snapshot packages should include date in the release tag (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages) - license information is completely missing in the sources files and even GPL is symlinked from autotools, but the license tag says it should MIT as written only on the web page - the empty run of configure should be dropped from the autogen.sh Updated. http://ivazquez.fedorapeople.org/packages/gtkparasite/gtkparasite.spec http://ivazquez.fedorapeople.org/packages/gtkparasite/gtkparasite-0-0.2.20090120git928494e5.src.rpm All issues are fixed, package is APPROVED. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gtkparasite Short Description: A GUI debugging tool for GTK+ applications Owners: ivazquez Branches: F-9 F-10 cvs done. Built for F9, F10, and Rawhide. |