Bug 48089
Summary: | gcc c++ explicit-instatiation template problem | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | Kenton Varda <temporal> |
Component: | gcc | Assignee: | Jakub Jelinek <jakub> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | David Lawrence <dkl> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 8.0 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | i586 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2004-10-01 23:00:00 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Kenton Varda
2001-07-09 16:22:29 UTC
It does not compile with g++ 2.95.2 and g++ 3.0 either. I don't have ISO C++ standard with me ATM, so I'd suggest you take this to comp.lang.c++ or something like that. Well, I asked on comp.lang.c++, and the two responses I received both said that they are pretty sure that is was a compiler bug. One guy said that he had reported the same bug to the GCC 3.0 people and had received no reply. He also said that Borland C++ compiles it just fine. Fixed in the gcc 3.4 c++ parser rewrite. |