Bug 484489

Summary: messagebus fails to start if the system is configured with ldap authentication
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Reporter: Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm>
Component: nss_ldapAssignee: Nalin Dahyabhai <nalin>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: BaseOS QE <qe-baseos-auto>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 5.3CC: amcnabb, amessina, ask, dqarras, ian, jarod, jplans, jsafrane, j, loganjerry, rbulling, redhatbugs, triage
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard: bzcl34nup
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 206399 Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-02-07 13:39:11 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 206399    
Bug Blocks:    

Description Axel Thimm 2009-02-07 09:42:28 UTC 
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #206399 +++

Description of problem:
The script /etc/init.d/messagebus hangs during bootup if the system is
configured for LDAP authentication. Disabling LDAP authentication solves the
problem.

_____________________________________________________________________

The problems described in the bug above exist in RHEL5 since 5.0.

If the server rebooting is ldap-serving itself, dbus hangs during reboots. In a debugging session, ensuring that ldap starts before messagebus solved the issue.

So it either needs a reordering of the boot sequence of the services (e.g. move ldap to the front of any consuming service), or some nss_ldap magic.
Comment 1 Axel Thimm 2009-02-07 11:47:34 UTC 
The fix was in the /etc/ldap.conf.rpmnew file. Sorry for the noise.

--------------------------

I can't close this as a duplicate of bug #243753, as bugzilla says:

 You tried to change the Status field from NEW  to CLOSED,
 but only a user with the required permissions may change that field.

 Please press Back and try again.

Can someone with sufficient permissions close this as a duplicate of bug #243753? Thanks!
Comment 2 Jose Plans 2009-02-07 13:39:11 UTC 
Sure, thanks!

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 243753 ***
Comment 3 Jose Plans 2009-02-07 13:39:31 UTC 
Sure, thanks!