Bug 484514
| Summary: | fonts in gs | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | acount closed by user <a1459440> |
| Component: | ghostscript | Assignee: | Tim Waugh <twaugh> |
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | than, twaugh |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2009-02-24 12:14:52 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 446451 | ||
also the ghostscript-fonts package must be deleted, because they are the _same_ fonts than urw-fonts. It's a pure "GNU" package when gs was not free! And anyway they both need to get fixed for F11 font infra changes or they won't be functional for F11 users bug #477389 bug #477477 Behdad's and Hughsie's stuff assumes sane packages have been converted by release tiume by their maintainers. (In reply to comment #1) > also the ghostscript-fonts package must be deleted, because they are the _same_ > fonts than urw-fonts. It's a pure "GNU" package when gs was not free! I don't think this is true actually. There are fonts shipped in ghostscript-fonts that are not shipped in urw-fonts or ghostscript, such as Hershey and Calligraphic-Katakana/Hiragana. ># Don't ship URW fonts; we already have them. >rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/ghostscript/%{gs_dot_ver}/Resource/Font > >because urw-fonts-2.4-6 are older(and with bugs) than the fonts included in >gs. > i don't think the urw-fonts-2.4-6 are older. The gs fonts in trunk are still based on 1.0.7pre43. The urw-fonts-2.4-6 are based on 1.0.7pre44 and it includes several fixes. It's correct that ghostscript removes the fonts included in gs >or get it a new urw-fonts code from >http://svn.ghostscript.com/ghostscript/trunk/urw-fonts/ . There is no more >ftp://ftp.gnome.ru/fonts/sources it's correct that the url ftp://ftp.gnome.ru/fonts/sources is not reachable, i tried to contact Valek but still didn't get any respone yet. > also the ghostscript-fonts package must be deleted, because they are the >_same_fonts than urw-fonts. It's a pure "GNU" package when gs was not free! no, it's not the same fonts what are in urw-fonts shipped. |
don't delete Font dir on the spec file: # Don't ship URW fonts; we already have them. rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/ghostscript/%{gs_dot_ver}/Resource/Font because urw-fonts-2.4-6 are older(and with bugs) than the fonts included in gs. or get it a new urw-fonts code from http://svn.ghostscript.com/ghostscript/trunk/urw-fonts/ . There is no more ftp://ftp.gnome.ru/fonts/sources -thanks-