Bug 484858
| Summary: | java-openjdk i386 and x86_64 dualinstallation | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Patrick Steiner <patrick> | |
| Component: | java-1.6.0-openjdk | Assignee: | Lillian Angel <langel> | |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | ||
| Priority: | low | |||
| Version: | 10 | CC: | bugs-redhat, dbhole, langel, lkundrak, loganjerry, madko, matt, mjw, overholt, urkle | |
| Target Milestone: | --- | |||
| Target Release: | --- | |||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | |||
| OS: | Linux | |||
| Whiteboard: | ||||
| Fixed In Version: | 1.6.0.0-29.b16.fc11 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | ||
| Clone Of: | ||||
| : | 590574 (view as bug list) | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2009-09-15 07:44:51 UTC | Type: | --- | |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | ||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | ||
| Embargoed: | ||||
| Bug Depends On: | 340391 | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 497408 | |||
|
Description
Patrick Steiner
2009-02-10 12:11:22 UTC
I am also affected by this problem. as a temporary workarouns I was able to add the f10 i386 updates repo explicitly to yum and update from there. here is the relevant stanza from /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-updates.repo: [updates-i386] name=Fedora $releasever - i386 - Updates failovermethod=priority #baseurl=http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/updates/$releasever/$basearch/ mirrorlist=http://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/mirrorlist?repo=updates-released-f$releasever&arch=i386 enabled=0 gpgcheck=1 gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-i386 and here is the yum command to install the i386 openjdk package. # yum install --enablerepo=updates-i386 java-1.6.0-openjdk.i386 note that the i386 repo is disabled by default, and only enabled for installing the openjdk package. *** Bug 487304 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Still impossible: package java-1.6.0-openjdk-1:1.6.0.0-15.b14.fc10.x86_64 (which is newer than java-1.6.0-openjdk-1:1.6.0.0-2b12.fc10.i386) is already installed file /usr/share/doc/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0/ChangeLog from install of java-1.6.0-openjdk-1:1.6.0.0-2b12.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package java-1.6.0-openjdk-1:1.6.0.0-15.b14.fc10.x86_64 file /usr/share/doc/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0/NEWS from install of java-1.6.0-openjdk-1:1.6.0.0-2b12.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package java-1.6.0-openjdk-1:1.6.0.0-15.b14.fc10.x86_64 file /usr/share/doc/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0/README from install of java-1.6.0-openjdk-1:1.6.0.0-2b12.fc10.i386 conflicts with file from package java-1.6.0-openjdk-1:1.6.0.0-15.b14.fc10.x86_64 too bad the package conflicts only with doc files. this is because you have two different version of openjdk.. If you install the SAME i386 release as the x86_64 release it works fine... To do this you need to download the java-1.6.0-openjdk 15.b14.fc10 from the i386 repo and install both at the same time.. rpm -Uvh java-1.6.0-openjdk*386* java-1.6.0-openjdk*x86_64* Now, what REALLY needs to happen is the i386 openjdk RPMS be available in the x86_64 repo so you don't have to access the 32bit repo. As I run some x86_64 java stuff and some 32bit java stuff (ie eclipse, as it runs better). java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-21.b16.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-21.b16.fc10 java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-29.b16.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-29.b16.fc11 java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-21.b16.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-29.b16.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |