Bug 485146

Summary: Mock build fails, koji builds succeeds
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot>
Component: mockAssignee: David Cantrell <dcantrell>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: rawhideCC: behdad, dcantrell, mebrown, pmatilai, tcallawa, williams
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-02-12 18:37:15 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 446451    
Attachments:
Description Flags
Mock logs none

Description Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-11 20:54:17 UTC 
Description of problem:

Trying to build
http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/bpg-fonts-20090203-1.fc11.src.rpm

in mock fails (see attached logs)

Trying to scratch-build the same srpm in koji succeeds
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1120306

Clearly we are hitting some mock bug (probably because the font autoprovides include the names the font files declare, and those name have a & in them)

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
mock-0.9.14-1.fc11.noarch
Comment 1 Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-11 20:55:23 UTC 
Created attachment 331619 [details]
Mock logs
Comment 2 Jesse Keating 2009-02-11 22:27:25 UTC 
Don't suppose you have this in english?  Would be weird that it would be a mock bug, given that your mock is likely newer than what's on the builders.
Comment 3 Nicolas Mailhot 2009-02-12 18:37:15 UTC 
Today everything builds so someone fixed his bug.

Good job :p
Comment 4 Jesse Keating 2009-02-12 18:56:07 UTC 
That sounds more like the repodata you are using was different from what the buildsystem was using.  The static repos only update the symlink on the server once per hour, so there could have been a window in there.