|Summary:||Chinese fonts is used for Japanese desktop after vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10 installed|
|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||Yuta Kitamura <kee>|
|Component:||cjkunifonts||Assignee:||Caius Chance <me>|
|Status:||CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE||QA Contact:||Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>|
|Version:||10||CC:||fonts-bugs, i18n-bugs, ivazqueznet, me, petersen, ryo-dairiki, tagoh|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2009-05-20 05:09:48 UTC||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Cloudforms Team:||---||Target Upstream Version:|
Description Yuta Kitamura 2009-02-14 13:44:28 UTC
Created attachment 331920 [details] Rendering comparison Description of problem: After installing vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10.noarch, some Japanese characters are incorrectly rendered with a different font (apparently a Chinese one). More specifically, when an ASCII alphabetical character is followed some Japanese characters (Japanese punctuations for example), the followed characters are not rendered with the VLGothic font, but with a Chinese one. This does not happen with VLGothic-fonts-20081029-1.fc10.noarch and before. See attached image for comparison. gedit is used for capturing. The "monospace" font and the "sans-serif" font causes this problem. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): vlgothic-fonts-20090204-2.fc10.noarch How reproducible: Always. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Display a Japanese text with "monospace" or "sans-serif" font. Actual results: Some characters are rendered with a Chinese font. Expected results: Characters should be rendered with the VLGothic font. Additional info:
Comment 1 Akira TAGOH 2009-02-16 02:04:01 UTC
Better reassigning to cjkunifonts.
Comment 2 Jens Petersen 2009-02-16 03:02:49 UTC
Can you post the output of: rpm -qa \*fonts\* | sort It would be hopeful if you can narrow down which font package is causing the problem. It might be baekmuk-ttf for example? (see also end of bug 475743 comment 32)
Comment 5 Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams 2009-02-24 06:48:10 UTC
The issue is 64-ttf-arphic-uming.conf. After renaming it to 67-... various glyphs came up as gothic. This file probably needs to be split into a high-priority serif portion, and a low-priority sans portion.
Comment 6 Jens Petersen 2009-02-24 07:09:38 UTC
Perhaps you can test with the cjkuni-*fonts packages in rawhide and see if that works better for you? They already have some fontconfig changes included.
Comment 7 Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams 2009-02-24 07:47:11 UTC
Installing the fonts from Rawhide did help.
Comment 8 Caius Chance 2009-02-25 04:26:17 UTC
Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2009-02-25 04:29:38 UTC
cjkunifonts-0.2.20080216.1-11.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cjkunifonts-0.2.20080216.1-11.fc10
Comment 10 Caius Chance 2009-02-25 05:13:43 UTC
Hi Yuta, could you kindly provide the test case you mentioned in comment #1 please? Thanks.
Comment 11 Yuta Kitamura 2009-02-27 08:12:27 UTC
Created attachment 333444 [details] Test case after cjkunifonts-uming package updated OK, here's a screenshot. It seems that everything is working flawlessly. Just FYI, I've updated only cjkunifonts-uming package, because it's the only package of cjkunifonts-* series installed in my box.
Comment 12 Jens Petersen 2009-03-02 01:47:45 UTC
Thanks for testing.
Comment 13 Fedora Update System 2009-03-13 18:42:10 UTC
cjkunifonts-0.2.20080216.1-11.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.