Bug 488078

Summary:	Missing dependencies listed in gupnp-1.0.pc
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Michel Lind <michel>
Component:	gupnp	Assignee:	Peter Robinson <pbrobinson>
Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	10	CC:	pbrobinson
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	gupnp-0.12.6-3.fc11	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2009-03-03 10:45:29 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Michel Lind 2009-03-02 15:10:06 UTC

Description of problem:
gupnp-1.0.pc lists the following dependencies that are not pulled in when installing gupnp-devel:

Requires:
libxml2-devel
libsoup-devel

Requires.Private:
uuid-devel
glib2-devel


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
gupnp-devel-0.12.5-1.fc10.x86_64

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install gupnp-devel on a system w/o development libraries
2. pkg-config --libs gupnp-1.0

  
Actual results:
pkg-config lists the missing libraries

Expected results:
This should work

Additional info:

Comment 1 Peter Robinson 2009-03-02 16:57:52 UTC

Hmm. I thought RPM picked those deps up. I'll add them now and push a fix out. The uuid package required is actually e2fsprogs-devel as that's the uuid package that it uses (why its in ext filesystem utils progs I have no idea :-) )

Comment 2 Peter Robinson 2009-03-02 17:54:27 UTC

Can you verify that the build I've just pushed fixes this issue (will be in rawhide shortly).

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1213984

Comment 3 Michel Lind 2009-03-02 18:20:22 UTC

That works, thanks. Didn't realize that uuid-devel actually installs ossp-uuid, not uuid.

I don't think rpm automatically resolves dependencies stated in .pc files. Too bad, really. A lot of packages are breaking now because the new pkgconfig also exposes Requires.Private, instead of just Requires, it'd have been nice to have more automation.

Comment 4 Peter Robinson 2009-03-02 22:30:52 UTC

Hmm. Looks like I need to go and review my other packages too to see what else is affected!

Comment 5 Peter Robinson 2009-03-03 10:45:29 UTC

Fixed in rawhide. The change is also in F-10 packages but I'll push it out on the next update to save on updates.