Bug 488103
Summary: | Review Request: django-evolution - Schema evolution for Django | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Michel Lind <michel> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-package-review, mail, michel, notting |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | michel:
fedora-review+
kevin: fedora-cvs+ |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2009-03-23 05:06:04 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 487097, 488151, 488963 |
Description
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
2009-03-02 18:03:27 UTC
The release number should probably be 0.x.prereleasedetails ? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#NonNumericRelease I'd suggest 0.1.%{alphatag}%{?dist} -- the date is probably less important than the actual SVN revision. Almost ready -- everything is fine apart from the release number. MUST + rpmlint: clean + package name: ok + spec file name ? package guideline-compliant this should probably be 0.x.%{alphatag}%{?dist} + license complies with guidelines + license field accurate + license file not deleted + spec in US English + spec legible + source matches upstream + builds under >= 1 archs: noarch + build dependencies complete + own all directories + no dupes in %files + permission + %clean RPM_BUILD_ROOT + macros used consistently + Package contains code + large docs => -doc: not that large + clean buildroot before install + filenames UTF-8 SHOULD - desc and summary contain translations if available + package build in mock on all architectures + package functioned as described + scriplets are sane + require package not files Updated. http://ivazquez.fedorapeople.org/packages/django-evolution/django-evolution.spec http://ivazquez.fedorapeople.org/packages/django-evolution/django-evolution-0.0-0.1.svnr164.src.rpm Change looks good. APPROVED. Can you please go on with the CVS procedure? New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: django-evolution Short Description: Schema evolution for Django Owners: ivazquez Branches: F-9 F-10 EL-5 cvs done. |