Bug 490303

Summary: libudev0 should be renamed to libudev or udev-libs
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Kevin Kofler <kevin>
Component: udevAssignee: Harald Hoyer <harald>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 11CC: harald
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-06-30 10:17:57 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Kevin Kofler 2009-03-15 01:37:00 UTC 
The libudev0 subpackage should be renamed to libudev (or possibly udev-libs, which is the common convention, but in this case libvolume_id is separate, so libudev is probably the better option). There should be no version suffix for the default version of a library, and in this case the suffix is even more pointless because libudev.so.0 is the _only_ version of the library.

Including the soname version in the package name is not useful with RPM because that's what the automatic soname dependencies are for.
Comment 1 Bug Zapper 2009-06-09 12:14:34 UTC 
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 11 development cycle.
Changing version to '11'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
Comment 2 Harald Hoyer 2009-06-30 10:17:57 UTC 
done in rawhide
Comment 3 Kevin Kofler 2009-06-30 14:44:40 UTC 
OK, but now you added libgudev1 which also shouldn't have that suffix.
Comment 4 Harald Hoyer 2009-06-30 14:58:43 UTC 
yes it should, because it has the version number in the library name.