Bug 490398
Summary: | lv2core needs update, also F-10 build is missing | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Orcan Ogetbil <oget.fedora> |
Component: | lv2core | Assignee: | Anthony Green <green> |
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | high | ||
Version: | 10 | CC: | bugs.michael, green |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | 3.0-3.fc10 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2009-04-01 14:01:56 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Orcan Ogetbil
2009-03-16 04:11:52 UTC
> I believe that this package should be noarch That would make it necessary to alter/redefine the LV2 path, which by default points into %_libdir > The files %{_datadir}/lv2 that are in the main package are actually > devel files. There are no files installed into %_datadir/lv2 In case you refer to %_libdir/lv2, notice the recommendation in the README. (In reply to comment #1) > > I believe that this package should be noarch > > That would make it necessary to alter/redefine the LV2 path, which by default > points into %_libdir > Yes, but this is the only modification needed. > > > The files %{_datadir}/lv2 that are in the main package are actually > > devel files. > > There are no files installed into %_datadir/lv2 > > In case you refer to %_libdir/lv2, notice the recommendation in the README. Yes, well after altering/redefining the LV2 path it will be %_datadir/lv2 . Sorry for not being clear. But I think I made a mistake here. Those files may be needed during runtime. So please ignore this comment of mine. Where do you store LV2 plugins then if not in LV2 path? arch specific plugins? oh, I see your point. Then this package needs to be arch-specific. Sorry my bad. I'm changing the bug title to reflect the remaining issues It's been two weeks since this bug was opened. I tried to contact the maintainer via email but got no reply. We need an F-10 build of lv2 to build slv2. It appears that I don't have time to do this anymore. I'm happy to give up maintainership if you'd like to pick it up. AG Sure Anthony, sorry to hear that. You've done great contributions to audio production packages in Fedora. I hope everything is going fine with you. Could you approve my pkgdb requests then? https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/lv2core Thanks for asking, but everything is great! It's just that Fedora work has dropped a little in my priorities recently. pkgdb requests are approved. AG lv2core-3.0-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lv2core-3.0-2.fc10 I updated slv2 and built it in both rawhide and F-10. Closing the bug. I meant lv2core. Well, I built slv2 too :) lv2core-3.0-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lv2core-3.0-3.fc10 lv2core-3.0-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |