Bug 491481

Summary:	esound-libs i586 and x86_64 version cannot coexist
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Robert de Rooy <rderooy>
Component:	esound	Assignee:	Lennart Poettering <lpoetter>
Status:	CLOSED RAWHIDE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	rawhide	CC:	lpoetter, mclasen
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	x86_64
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2009-04-01 04:04:38 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Robert de Rooy 2009-03-21 16:48:59 UTC

Description of problem:
Trying to install wine on Fedora 11 Alpha with all updates applied tries to pull in esound-libs.i586, while esound-libs.x86_64 is already installed. This causes 2 errors. The x86_64 version is slightly newer and a config file conflict

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
esound-libs-1:0.2.41-1.fc10.x86_64
esound-libs-1:0.2.40-2.fc11.i586

How reproducible:
try to install both x86_64 and i586 version of esound-libs

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install Fedora 11
2. update with all available updates
3. try to install wine, which pulls in esound-libs.i586
  
Actual results:
Transaction Check Error:
  package esound-libs-1:0.2.41-1.fc10.x86_64 (which is newer than esound-libs-1:0.2.40-2.fc11.i586) is already installed
  file /etc/esd.conf from install of esound-libs-1:0.2.40-2.fc11.i586 conflicts with file from package esound-libs-1:0.2.41-1.fc10.x86_64

Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Robert de Rooy 2009-03-22 21:05:55 UTC

I noticed that 'package-cleanup --orphans' was listing esound-libs, and that the rawhide repository does have an fc11 x86_64 version that will not be installed since my fc10 version (which I got from a clean F11 alpha install) is newer.

So I downloaded the fc11 x86_64 version and did a force install. I also had to manually remove the fc10 version because after the force install I had both the fc10 and fc11 version in the RPM db.

after that the wine install succeeded.

Comment 2 Matthias Clasen 2009-03-30 04:08:24 UTC

Looking at the contents of /etc/esd.conf, I think we may want to patch esd_config.c to default esd_no_spawn to 1, and then nuke the config file.

Does that sound ok ?

Comment 3 Lennart Poettering 2009-03-30 14:24:39 UTC

Sounds good to me. But I am not sure this is any high priority. After all the only reason why esd is still in the archive is that I need something to test my stuff against.

Comment 4 Robert de Rooy 2009-03-30 17:48:58 UTC

Perhaps the wine package should not pull in wine-esd anymore, which in turn pulls in esound-libs. At least if I understand correctly that wine does not actually need ESD.

But yes, changing the defaults such that the config file is no longer required, seems like a good idea.

Comment 5 Matthias Clasen 2009-04-01 04:04:38 UTC

I've removed /etc/esd.conf in rawhide.