Bug 491967

Summary:	Change Listable getResult signature to take the action mapping
Product:	[Community] Spacewalk	Reporter:	Jay Dobies <jason.dobies>
Component:	WebUI	Assignee:	Jay Dobies <jason.dobies>
Status:	CLOSED DEFERRED	QA Contact:	Red Hat Satellite QA List <satqe-list>
Severity:	low	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	0.5	CC:	cperry, jpazdziora
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2011-08-05 12:28:08 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	723481

Description Jay Dobies 2009-03-24 19:36:16 UTC

This BZ is a tracker for enhancing the new list tag implementation. Passing in the action mapping to the getResult method would let us pass in properties to actions that use the tag that dictate the data returned (the action mapping is needed to get the property values).

One use case is the errata pages. I'd like to have one action that handled loading the data for both "all" and "relevant" errata. To determine which to display, a property could be set on the action in the struts-config.xml. Based on the value, the getResult method could decide which data to load for the tag.

Note that this is not needed for any particular release (there are workarounds), rather is just an enhancement to working with the tag.

Comment 1 Jan Pazdziora 2010-11-19 16:04:23 UTC

Mass-moving to space13.

Comment 2 Jan Pazdziora 2011-02-28 18:39:07 UTC

Jason,

do you have a patch for this bugzilla, or some code to start with?

Thank you,

Jan

Comment 3 Miroslav Suchý 2011-04-11 07:33:01 UTC

We did not have time for this one during Spacewalk 1.4 time frame. Mass moving to Spacewalk 1.5.

Comment 4 Miroslav Suchý 2011-04-11 07:37:00 UTC

We did not have time for this one during Spacewalk 1.4 time frame. Mass moving to Spacewalk 1.5.

Comment 5 Jan Pazdziora 2011-07-20 11:51:10 UTC

Aligning under space16.

Comment 6 Clifford Perry 2011-08-05 12:28:08 UTC

This is not a priority for Red Hat's Spacewalk developers and will likely not be completed by Red Hat in the next 2 years. We agree that this is a valid request and something that could be achieved. Since reporter by developer for improving this sub-system/component of Spacewalk code I am closing this out as DEFERRED. Feel free to re-open if you wish this re-reviewed. 

Cliff