Bug 492632

Summary: file conflicts: file /usr/share/bookmarks/default-bookmarks.html conflicts between attempted installs of astronomy-bookmarks-1-4.fc11.noarch and fedora-bookmarks-10-2.noarch
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: James Laska <jlaska>
Component: astronomy-bookmarksAssignee: Marek Mahut <mmahut>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: rawhideCC: astronomy, dcantrell, jturner, lkundrak, mmahut, tcallawa
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-04-16 19:28:38 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 476775    

Description James Laska 2009-03-27 19:07:02 UTC
Description:
 * Manually installing all packages on F-11-Beta fails due to a dependency conflict

Steps to reproduce:
 * https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=QA/TestCases/PackageSetsEverything&action=edit&redlink=1 

Actual Results:

08:09:48 ERROR   : file conflicts: file /usr/share/bookmarks/default-bookmarks.html conflicts between attempted installs of astronomy-bookmarks-1-4.fc11.noarch and fedora-bookmarks-10-2.noarch

Comment 1 Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-04-15 19:25:51 UTC
I'm not sure how we want to handle this. The astronomy-bookmarks package is only intended for the Astronomy Fedora spin, but I'd really prefer if it didn't Conflict: fedora-bookmarks

Either way, I'm not sure this is a blocker.

Comment 2 Marek Mahut 2009-04-16 08:50:32 UTC
I don't think this is a blocker either. I can remove the conflict with fedora-bookmarks, but if someone installs fedora-bookmars on default installation it will rewrite default-bookmarks.html from fedora-bookmarks. What do you think is the best option?

Comment 3 Lubomir Rintel 2009-04-16 09:09:43 UTC
I'd say this is okay. If we remove the Conflict, we'll get a file conflict anyway.
Another solution would be to modify both packages to utilize an alternatives(8) system.

Comment 4 Jesse Keating 2009-04-16 18:53:17 UTC
I'm leaving this open as we'll want to prevent astronomy-bookmarks from being on the DVD and iso sets.  Moving to Preview.

Comment 5 Jesse Keating 2009-04-16 19:28:38 UTC
I updated the kickstart for the Fedora spin to exclude the astronomy-bookmarks.