Bug 494956

Summary: Odd error display when creating a cluster
Product: [Retired] Red Hat Cluster Suite Reporter: Steven J. Levine <slevine>
Component: congaAssignee: Ryan McCabe <rmccabe>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Brian Brock <bbrock>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 4CC: cluster-maint, edamato, redwolfe, rmccabe
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-05-25 20:36:12 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Steven J. Levine 2009-04-08 19:55:01 UTC
Description of problem:
I am running this release of Luci:

luci-0.11.2-1.el4.x86_64.rpm 

When I used Conga to create a 3-node cluster, the system successfully created the cluster and created the proper cluster.conf files in each node. However, after creating the cluster the system displayed the following message on the screen:

Site error

This site encountered an error trying to fulfill your request. The errors were:

Error Type
    KeyError
Error Value
    'has_ignore_undef_fence'
Request made at
    2009/04/06 10:59:00.058 GMT-5 

As noted, I did successfully create the cluster, but this was a notable message to see.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 4 Brian Brock 2009-04-29 21:25:55 UTC
verified in luci-0.11.2-2.el4

I cannot recreate the error, after creating new clusters

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2009-05-25 20:36:12 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on therefore solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2009-1063.html

Comment 7 Matthias Clasen 2011-04-29 14:02:17 UTC
*** Bug 692554 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***