Bug 496475
| Summary: | Review Request: perl-Lexical-Persistence - Persistent lexical variable values for arbitrary calls | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Iain Arnell <iarnell> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Chris Weyl <cweyl> |
| Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-package-review, notting |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | cweyl:
fedora-review+
kevin: fedora-cvs+ |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| URL: | http://search.cpan.org/dist/Lexical-Persistence/ | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | 0.98-1.fc11 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2009-04-24 03:30:25 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Iain Arnell
2009-04-19 14:29:46 UTC
There's an examples directory (eg/), why not include it in %doc? koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1307872 Spec looks sane, clean and consistent; license is correct (GPL+ or Artistic); make test passes cleanly. Source tarballs match upstream (sha1sum): c2e97f5008c68f0b9f7f643a9ce4b21bfee572d7 Lexical-Persistence-0.98.tar.gz c2e97f5008c68f0b9f7f643a9ce4b21bfee572d7 Lexical-Persistence-0.98.tar.gz.srpm Final provides / requires are sane: 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. =====> perl-Lexical-Persistence-0.98-1.fc10.src.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-Lexical-Persistence-0.98-1.fc10.src.rpm ====> requires for perl-Lexical-Persistence-0.98-1.fc10.src.rpm perl(Devel::LexAlias) >= 0.04 perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) perl(PadWalker) >= 1.1 perl(Test::More) perl(Test::Pod) perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) =====> perl-Lexical-Persistence-0.98-1.fc10.noarch.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-Lexical-Persistence-0.98-1.fc10.noarch.rpm perl(Lexical::Persistence) = 0.98 perl-Lexical-Persistence = 0.98-1.fc10 ====> requires for perl-Lexical-Persistence-0.98-1.fc10.noarch.rpm perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Devel::LexAlias) perl(PadWalker) perl(strict) perl(warnings) APPROVED New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Lexical-Persistence Short Description: Persistent lexical variable values for arbitrary calls Owners: iarnell Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig cvs done. perl-Lexical-Persistence-0.98-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Lexical-Persistence-0.98-1.fc10 perl-Lexical-Persistence-0.98-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Lexical-Persistence-0.98-1.fc11 Thanks for the review! :-) perl-Lexical-Persistence-0.98-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. perl-Lexical-Persistence-0.98-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |