Bug 496897

Summary: wesnoth-debuginfo does not contain sources
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Debarshi Ray <debarshir>
Component: wesnothAssignee: Gwyn Ciesla <gwync>
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: rawhideCC: gwync, wtogami
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
URL: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-April/msg00509.html
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2009-04-23 18:30:17 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 496968    
Attachments:
Description Flags
Updated Spec. none

Description Debarshi Ray 2009-04-21 15:17:39 UTC 
Description of problem:
The debuginfo sub-package is supposed to contain the source files, which is not
the case for Wesnoth.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
All versions currently available for Rawhide, Fedora 11, Fedora 10 and Fedora
9.
Comment 1 Debarshi Ray 2009-04-21 15:21:20 UTC 
Created attachment 340549 [details]
Updated Spec.

Due to huge size of the sources, I have not verified the build.
Comment 2 Debarshi Ray 2009-04-21 15:21:33 UTC 
Please request a freeze override for Fedora 11 according to
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ReleaseEngineering/FinalFreezePolicy
Comment 3 Gwyn Ciesla 2009-04-21 15:25:30 UTC 
Testing.
Comment 4 Gwyn Ciesla 2009-04-23 17:34:35 UTC 
Looks OK.  Should I do this for 10 and 9 as well?  Wesnoth's. . . huge.
Comment 5 Warren Togami 2009-04-23 18:21:04 UTC 
Only if we are issuing a version upgrade in 9 or 10.
Comment 6 Gwyn Ciesla 2009-04-23 18:30:17 UTC 
Well, we have 1.6.1 in rawhide and 11, and 1.6 in 10.  In that case, I'll push 1.6.1 to 10, and let 9 be.