Bug 498035
Summary: | Hyperspec rpm would be nice to make installing limp easier. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Drew Ogle <dantealiegri> |
Component: | sbcl | Assignee: | Rex Dieter <rdieter> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 11 | CC: | green, rdieter |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | http://www.lispworks.com/documentation/common-lisp.html | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2010-02-18 18:05:12 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Drew Ogle
2009-04-28 15:39:37 UTC
Does hyperspec have anything to do with sbcl? Or is this a "fedora doesn't yet package X, please do so..." kind of request? If the latter, we could add it to our package wishlist. Rex - not directly directly, but I'm using limp for vim to interact with sbcl, and it uses the hyperspec to compile a lisp thesaurus. So it certainly has something to do with sbcl for me ;) This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 11 development cycle. Changing version to '11'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping So, this needs to go through the usual new package process, http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join or http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/New_package_process_for_existing_contributors there's always this, if you are happy with waiting for someone else to do it too: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_maintainers_wishlist |