Bug 498688
| Summary: | Please build latest libical for EPEL 4 and 5 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora EPEL | Reporter: | Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla> |
| Component: | libical | Assignee: | Debarshi Ray <debarshir> |
| Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | low | ||
| Version: | el5 | CC: | lkundrak, vanmeeuwen+fedora |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | kevin:
fedora-cvs+
|
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | 0.43-4.el4, 0.43-4.el5 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2009-05-06 22:47:10 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 498194 | ||
|
Description
Robert Scheck
2009-05-01 22:58:16 UTC
I noticed, that libical is EL-5 only currently. Is there any interest by the libical maintainers to branch and maintain EL-4 as well? I built the new version in EL-5 branch and verified that it's binary compatible with the older one for sunbird to run. Handing the bug over to Rishi to decide about the EL-4 branch (I have not interest in it). Although I have no interest in EL-4, I would not object to anyone else who might want to do it. Robert, would you be interested in doing it yourself? I verified, that sunbird is still building with newer libical in case if it shouldn't be binary compatible with the older version. As libical will be a dependency of my Zarafa package, I think, I'm going to maintain it on EL-4. Lubomir, question for me is, whether you still want to care about libical on EL-5 or not (when remembering to our yesterday IRC talk where you've mentioned, that you're using sunbird no longer that active as in the past)? Means in the end, that I would be willing to maintain the libical package on EL-4 and EL-5 even. Maybe you can let me know about this. [16:39:24] < rsc> lkundrak: I made a comment to the libical bug, maybe you can let me know. [16:45:02] < lkundrak> rsc: so you'd like to take care of libical in EL-5? I can orphan it in pkgdb, you can take it then [16:45:26] < rsc> lkundrak: okay, we can do that, if it's okay for you [16:47:58] < lkundrak> rsc: I released the package. Feel free to take it. And thanks! https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/libical#FedoraEPEL5 [16:48:16] < rsc> lkundrak: Taken. Do you want me to approve watch*, commit*, approve*? [16:49:39] < lkundrak> rsc: no need to. I don't even remember applying for it, dunno why it's there :) [16:50:04] < rsc> lkundrak: okay, so I would remove you then. If you some day want to change it, just let me know ;) Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: libical New Branches: EL-4 Owners: robert cvs done. 2200 (libical): Build on target fedora-4-epel succeeded. |