Bug 499955

Summary: Improve RHEL5 boot time by fixing nash's stabilized command
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 Reporter: Dag Wieers <dag>
Component: mkinitrdAssignee: Peter Jones <pjones>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: Release Test Team <release-test-team>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: low    
Version: 5.4CC: ajb, cheguaka, dag, ddumas, phil, redhat-bugzilla, timothy.ty.lee
Target Milestone: rc   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
URL: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=193206
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2010-07-02 03:05:01 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description Dag Wieers 2009-05-09 14:04:58 UTC
Description of problem:
Booting RHEL5 takes more time then necessary because nash's stabilized function has a bug. The fix is available from #193206 in rawhide, but it would be a small effort to port this back to RHEL 5.4.

The difference between booting without the current stabilized function makes a huge difference (more than 15 seconds) so if this is fixed it makes a big difference resuming from hibernate.

And it may look nice on the feature list too :-)

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
RHEL 5.3 and earlier

How reproducible:

Steps to Reproduce:
1. echo stabilized / | time strace nash
Actual results:

Expected results:

Additional info:

Comment 1 Dag Wieers 2009-05-09 14:06:42 UTC
Bug 193206 ?

Comment 2 Dag Wieers 2009-07-22 16:43:10 UTC
Can someone from Red Hat please investigate ?

I am sure we now missed the opportunity for RHEL 5.4... :-/

Comment 3 Denise Dumas 2009-07-22 16:54:04 UTC
This was never even proposed for 5.4, would be 5.5 at absolute best given the gazillion conflicting and higher priorities, and that's if a miracle happens. 
If this is a big issue for you, please escalate it through your support channel.

Comment 4 cheguaka 2010-02-15 08:29:30 UTC
Will this bug be fixed for 5.5?

Comment 5 RHEL Program Management 2010-07-02 03:05:01 UTC
Development Management has reviewed and declined this request.  You may appeal
this decision by reopening this request.