Bug 502215

Summary:	popt-devel: file conflict errors when installing both i586 and x86_64 versions
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Gerry Reno <greno>
Component:	doxygen	Assignee:	Than Ngo <than>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	low
Version:	11	CC:	pmatilai, redhat-bugzilla, than
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2009-08-14 12:57:09 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Gerry Reno 2009-05-22 15:20:38 UTC

Description of problem:
popt-devel: file conflict errors when installing both i586 and x86_64 versions

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.rpm.yum/13073/focus=13086
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Robert Scheck 2009-05-22 15:33:16 UTC

The images are doxygen generated. That issue has shown up in the past already 
multiple times caused by crappy freetype/fontconfig and/or libpng. One of these
libraries creates different images on different architectures which is a bug
there and never should happen. This is no problem of popt or its files. Re-
assigning to doxygen, because that one IIRC caused the problem the last time.

Comment 2 Bug Zapper 2009-06-09 16:21:14 UTC

This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 11 development cycle.
Changing version to '11'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

Comment 3 Robert Scheck 2009-06-25 13:16:06 UTC

I would say, this bug report is a duplicate of bug #507982.

Comment 4 Panu Matilainen 2009-06-25 13:33:07 UTC

I would say, just loose the damn doxygen generated docs :)

I just had a closer look and they aren't really API documentation (the API is covered in the man-page) but more like annotated source code, containing references to popt internals such as static functions etc. As such, they're not particularly useful to libpopt API user, only to somebody who's hacking popt itself and in that case they already have the source and can build the docs by themselves if they want.

Comment 5 Robert Scheck 2009-08-14 12:57:09 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 507982 ***