Red Hat Bugzilla – Full Text Bug Listing
|Summary:||Request for adding Antico window manager to Fedora repo|
|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||RJ <ogldelphi>|
|Component:||Package Review||Assignee:||Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>|
|Status:||CLOSED NOTABUG||QA Contact:||Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||Bug Fix|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2010-01-25 19:19:27 EST||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Bug Depends On:|
Description RJ 2009-06-19 05:30:33 EDT
Antico is a Qt4/X11 Desktop/Window Manager (i.e. KDE+KWin) * The goal is to create a Window/Desktop manager simple and fast. * All parameters must be configured from few files, avoiding unnecessary complications, following the K.I.S.S. philosophy. * The whole project is based only on Qt4 libraries, without any other external dependencies (e.g. kdelibs …) git: http://github.com/antico/antico/tree/master Keyboard switcher for Antico: git://github.com/disels/axkb.git p.s this is my first package request and if I did something wrong, please do not angry to me. Thanks for you time.
Comment 1 Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-19 06:15:14 EDT
I don't see a spec file or source RPM for review. If you just want to make a request for someone else to package this software, add it to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/WishList. There are no guarantees that someone else will volunteer to maintain the package, however. If you want to actually submit this package yourself and maintain it in Fedora, please see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join and follow the instructions there.
Comment 2 RJ 2009-06-19 06:24:16 EDT
Ok. Thank you. I'll try to adapt the spec file from another rpm distribution and add it here.
Comment 3 Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-23 14:14:14 EDT
Since there's no package to review, I'll mark this as not being ready. Please clear the whiteboard if you're ready to have a package reviewed.
Comment 4 Jason Tibbitts 2010-01-25 19:19:27 EST
Still no package to review more than half a year later; closing this out.