Bug 507293
| Summary: | [Broadcom 5.3.z FEAT] Update bnx2 to 1.8.2b+ | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 | Reporter: | RHEL Program Management <pm-rhel> | ||||
| Component: | kernel | Assignee: | Ivan Vecera <ivecera> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Red Hat Kernel QE team <kernel-qe> | ||||
| Severity: | urgent | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | urgent | ||||||
| Version: | 5.4 | CC: | agospoda, andriusb, benlu, bshepher, bugproxy, bzeranski, charles_rose, dhoward, dzickus, enarvaez, ivecera, james.brown, james.leddy, jcm, jfeeney, jjarvis, jlarrew, jpirko, jtorrice, karen.skweres, martinez, niran, pm-eus, qcai, rpacheco, sandy.garza, syeghiay, tao | ||||
| Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | FutureFeature, OtherQA, Reopened, ZStream | ||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | All | ||||||
| OS: | Linux | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2009-12-18 14:14:40 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Bug Depends On: | 475567 | ||||||
| Bug Blocks: | |||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
RHEL Program Management
2009-06-22 08:25:46 UTC
Closing based on following statement:
>>> Ok, keep in mind there was some history on this. The reason this
>>> originally had the 5.3.z flag is because that's what a prod support
>>> customer wanted, however Andy said no, so we went with the hotfix
>>> packages on it. The 5.3.z flag was never removed and then someone
>>> asked again if we were going to do it and Andy said, only if you
>>> isolate a smaller set of patches for 5.3.z. So, Flavio did that (I
>>> think ... some confusion here) and the latest plan was to push those
>>> into the next 5.3.z. The original requestees have gone away, which
>>> made your customer the biggest driving factor behind this request.
>>> All that aside, do you think we should drop this request and do a
>>> kbase article instead (indicating that TSO needs disabled)?
Jiri
*** Bug 502196 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Created attachment 350311 [details]
Proposed patch
Proposed patch for RHEL 5.3.z
Testing kernel builds are available at: http://people.redhat.com/ivecera/rhel-5z-ivtest/ Testing kernel from http://people.redhat.com/ivecera/rhel-5z-ivtest/kernel-2.6.18-128.1.14.el5.ivtest.x86_64.rpm w/ RHEL 5.3 I tried my testing kernel and issue seems to be solved. Joe, could you confirm this also? Ivan: Sorry, yes, haven't seen any issues w/ this kernel. We ran 72+ hours of traffic "stress" and no issues were seen. |